Sunday, August 27, 2023

20230828 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P41

20230828 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P41

 

Với tài liệu bên dưới cho thấy Hoa Kỳ tiến hành việc kết thúc chiến tranh qua Paris Pease Accords 1973 cho dù có sự đồng thuận hay không đồng thuận của Tổng Thống Thiệu.

Nó củng cho thấy một điều khác nửa là vấn đề cộng sản giặc Hồ đã đầu hàng Hoa Kỳ sau cuộc hành quân dội bomb Operation Linebacker II từ ngày 18 tháng 12 cho đến 29 tháng 12 năm 1972.

Hoa Kỳ đã dấu đi bức điện văn đầu hàng của cộng sản giặc Hồ đã gửi cho tòa đại sứ Mỷ tại Sài-gòn.

Và để khỏi phải bồi thường chiến tranh cho phía Hà-nội củng như sự viện trợ cho miền Nam như đã hứa, với biến cố Watergate xảy ra, quốc hội Hoa Kỳ buộc Nixon từ chức để xóa sổ nợ công khai trước công chúng thế giới.

42. Memorandum of Conversation

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/ch6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d42

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1165

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1166

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1167

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1168

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1169

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1170

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1171

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1172

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1173

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1174

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1175

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1176

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1177

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1178

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1179

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1180

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1181

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1182

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1183

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1184

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1185

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1186

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1187

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1188

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255

255. Memorandum From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) to President Nixon 1

Paris, January 8, 1973.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.53.8.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.53.12.4.2

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.53.12.4.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d255#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.53.12.22.4

264. Message From Richard T. Kennedy of the National Security Council Staff to the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) in Paris1

Washington, January 11, 1973, 1752Z.

Nixon:… “I also totally agree that we must go ahead with the agreement with Hanoi regardless of whether Thieu goes along or not. If we cannot deliver [Page 945] Thieu, we then obviously will have the problem of Hanoi’s reaction. In that event, there would be no Presidential announcement made on Thursday, January 18. Instead, we would have Haig delay his return so that there would be no pressure for an announcement until after January 20. Then, on January 22, I would make an announcement that we had reached an agreement in principle with the North Vietnamese and call on Thieu to adhere to it. I have already told Haig that he is to tell Thieu that we are not going to negotiate with him but rather that we will proceed and we are presenting this, in effect, on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.”

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_945

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.79.8.4

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.79.16.2

48. Memorandum of Conversation1

Paris, January 23, 1973, 9:35 a.m.–1:20 p.m.

….

“ Between January 13 and January 23, that is between the final two January Kissinger- Le Duc Tho meetings before the agreement was signed, Thieu decided to accept the agreement. See Foreign Relations, 1969–1976, vol. IX, Vietnam, October 1972–January 1973 Documents 320, 322, and 329.

After Kissinger had failed to get Thieu’s agreement in October, Nixon made Haig his chief emissary to Thieu. In trips to Saigon in November, December, and January, Haig delivered increasingly tough messages from Nixon, essentially ultimatums, that signaled irrevocably the United States’ intention to sign the agreement even if South Vietnam did not. Furthermore, if South Vietnam did not sign, it could not depend on future U.S. assistance. In response to this pressure, Thieu agreed. On December 19, 1972, however, he perceptively commented to Haig, when the latter delivered the penultimate ultimatum: “Given the realities of the situation, what I am being asked to sign is not a treaty for peace but a treaty for continued U.S. support.” Haig replied: “I agree with your analysis.” (Haig, Inner Circles, p. 331)”….

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d48

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1344

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1345

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1346

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1347

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1348

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1349

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1350

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1351

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1352

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1353

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1354

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1355

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1356

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1357

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1358

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1359

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1360

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1361

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1362

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1363

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1364

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1365

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1366

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1367

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d320

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d322

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d329

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d48#fnref:1.7.4.4.28.23.8.2

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d48#fnref:1.7.4.4.28.23.230.6

 

Van Ban Hiep Dinh Paris 27011973

http://suthat-toiac.blogspot.com/2008/07/hip-nh-paris-2711973-vn-bn.html

Agreement on ending the war and restoring peace in Viet-Nam. Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/volume-935-I-13295-English.pdf

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/v935.pdf

***

NLF=National Liberation Front=Mặt Trận Dân Tộc Giải Phóng,

PRG=Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam = Chính phủ Cách mạng Lâm thời Việt Nam,

DRVN= Democratic Republic of North Vietnam=Việt Nam Dân Chủ Cộng Hòa=cộng sản Bắc Việt.

DRV (also DRVN), Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam

NLF, National Liberation Front, Communist front organization in South Vietnam acting as political government of the insurgency; later renamed Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam

NVA, North Vietnamese Army, term used by the United States for the People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PAVN, People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PLAF, People’s Liberation Armed Forces, Communist forces in South Vietnam, synonymous with Viet Cong

PRG, Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, political wing of the South Vietnamese Communist movement, replaced the National Liberation Front (NLF), but the terms are often used interchangeably

Paris Peace Talks, a loosely defined term that, depending on context, could mean the secret meetings between Henry Kissinger for the United States and Le Duc Tho for the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam or the 174 meetings of the public talks held from 1968 to 1973 between the United States and the Republic of (South) Vietnam on one side and the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam on the other; the latter were also known as Plenary or Avénue Kléber talks

Rue Darthé, 11 Rue Darthé, the address of one of the residences of the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam in the Paris suburb of Choisy-le-Roi used as a venue for the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho negotiations.

Avenue Kléber (also Ave. Kléber or Kléber), address of the International Conference Center at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, the site of the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; see also Paris Peace Talks

SALT, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks

Seven Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on May 31, 1971, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho; peace plan presented by the NLF Delegation in July 1971 at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Nine Points, peace plan presented by Xuan Thuy on June 26, 1971

Ten Points, peace plan presented by NLF delegate Madame Binh on May 8, 1969, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; peace plan presented by Le Duc Tho on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Kissinger; peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 14, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

Two-Point Elaboration, elaboration of the Ten Point peace plan presented by the DRV Delegation on February 2, 1972, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Twelve Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

strategic hamlets, a South Vietnamese Government program to counter Viet Cong control in the countryside. The government relocated farmers into fortified hamlets to provide defense, economic aid, and political assistance to residents. The hope was that protection from Viet Cong raids and taxation would bind the rural populace to the government and gain their loyalty. The program started in 1962, but was fatally undermined by over expansion and poor execution. By 1964 it had clearly failed.

GVN, Government of (South) Vietnam

RVN, Republic of (South) Vietnam

RVNAF, Republic of (South) Vietnam Armed Forces

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/terms

***

No comments:

Post a Comment