Thursday, August 31, 2023

20230901 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P45

20230901 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P45

 

Trong tài liệu nầy cho thấy ngày 23 tháng Giêng năm 1973 chỉ là ngày chuẩn thuận hiệp ước đình chiến Paris Peace Accords 1973.

Ngày thực thụ ký kết hiệp ước Paris Peace Accords 1973 là ngày 27 tháng Giêng 1973.

Lúc nầy Lê Đức Thọ trở lại vấn đề mặc cả sự bồi thường chiến tranh với Kissinger từ 3 tỷ dollars tăng lên 5 tỷ với lý do vì Hoa Kỳ đã bị dội bomb qua Operation Linebacker II trong cuối tháng 12 năm 1972.

Đọc đoạn văn dưới đây liệu có ai hiểu được ý của Lê Đức Thọ trong việc đòi tiền Kissinger?

… “Le Duc Tho: So now regarding the healing of the war wounds. I have expressed my views on this question at length in October. You have known our views. I think that it is an obligation of the United States to reconstruct our economy and to rehabilitate our economy after the war. I agree with you that this is not a protocol attached to the agreement, but it is something between us two independently of the agreement and this will reflect the relationship we have after the war. So I would like to propose now we will have a provisional bilateral protocol not attached to the agreement. And when you visit Hanoi we will discuss this in detail and we will come to a concrete agreement. [Page 1299] I think that this protocol now will include only a number of principles. We have drafted this protocol mentioning a number of principles. I would like to hear your views.” …

Lê Đức Thọ đòi tiền cho cả dân miền Bắc hay chỉ cho riêng bộ chính trị cộng sản giặc Hồ?

Đoạn văn dưới đây cho thấy có lẻ Kissinger hiểu ý Lê Đức Thọ cho nên đã lấy Article 3 để giải thích cho Lê Đức Thọ.

“…   Le Duc Tho: A new one, which supersedes the old one in December. Only basic principles. [Dr. Kissinger reads Tab D, DRV draft of January 10.]

Dr. Kissinger: You consider $5 billion a principle? [Tho laughs]

Le Duc Tho: I will discuss it with you. Previously we agreed on the rough amount of $3 billion, but the recent bombings created a great deal of material and human losses. We can say that the losses caused at that time was one-third of the damages caused since the resumption of the bombing. This is our proposal and we will discuss it. And I think that the $5 billion amount is something reasonable.

Dr. Kissinger: And logical. [Tho laughs] You should try that before a Congressional committee sometimes. But let me explain our difficulties. First, just looking through this protocol. Your saying that something is not a protocol attached to the agreement does not necessarily make it so. Where you say “in implementing Article 21, Chapter VIII, of the Agreement,” that clearly makes it part of it. I mean, I just give you as an example. Now Article 1, “the contribution by the Government of the United States is made without conditions attached,” that is all right. But “without repayment,” that is technically impossible, although we can arrange the payment in such a way that it has no very immediate consequence. It is very difficult to put into an agreement but in practice this can be handled.

Now Article 2, for the reasons we gave you, is impossible.

Article 3, “the contribution of the government is used for the reconstruction of installations damaged during”—we can say “for the economic development of Vietnam.” And even the word “reconstruction.” …..

20230717 Jan 12 73 Hak Tho Negotiations Memorandum 46

46. Memorandum of Conversation

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/ch6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d46

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1277

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1278

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1279

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1280

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1281

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1282

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1283

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1284

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1285

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1286

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1287

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1288

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1289

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1290

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1291

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1292

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1293

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1294

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1295

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1296

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1297

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1298

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1299

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1300

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1301

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1302

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1303

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1304

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1305

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1306

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1307

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d46#fnref:1.7.4.4.28.17.8.2

Van Ban Hiep Dinh Paris 27011973

http://suthat-toiac.blogspot.com/2008/07/hip-nh-paris-2711973-vn-bn.html

Agreement on ending the war and restoring peace in Viet-Nam. Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/volume-935-I-13295-English.pdf

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/v935.pdf

***

NLF=National Liberation Front=Mặt Trận Dân Tộc Giải Phóng,

PRG=Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam = Chính phủ Cách mạng Lâm thời Việt Nam,

DRVN= Democratic Republic of North Vietnam=Việt Nam Dân Chủ Cộng Hòa=cộng sản Bắc Việt.

DRV (also DRVN), Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam

NLF, National Liberation Front, Communist front organization in South Vietnam acting as political government of the insurgency; later renamed Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam

NVA, North Vietnamese Army, term used by the United States for the People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PAVN, People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PLAF, People’s Liberation Armed Forces, Communist forces in South Vietnam, synonymous with Viet Cong

PRG, Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, political wing of the South Vietnamese Communist movement, replaced the National Liberation Front (NLF), but the terms are often used interchangeably

Paris Peace Talks, a loosely defined term that, depending on context, could mean the secret meetings between Henry Kissinger for the United States and Le Duc Tho for the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam or the 174 meetings of the public talks held from 1968 to 1973 between the United States and the Republic of (South) Vietnam on one side and the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam on the other; the latter were also known as Plenary or Avénue Kléber talks

Rue Darthé, 11 Rue Darthé, the address of one of the residences of the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam in the Paris suburb of Choisy-le-Roi used as a venue for the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho negotiations.

Avenue Kléber (also Ave. Kléber or Kléber), address of the International Conference Center at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, the site of the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; see also Paris Peace Talks

SALT, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks

Seven Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on May 31, 1971, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho; peace plan presented by the NLF Delegation in July 1971 at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Nine Points, peace plan presented by Xuan Thuy on June 26, 1971

Ten Points, peace plan presented by NLF delegate Madame Binh on May 8, 1969, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; peace plan presented by Le Duc Tho on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Kissinger; peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 14, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

Two-Point Elaboration, elaboration of the Ten Point peace plan presented by the DRV Delegation on February 2, 1972, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Twelve Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

strategic hamlets, a South Vietnamese Government program to counter Viet Cong control in the countryside. The government relocated farmers into fortified hamlets to provide defense, economic aid, and political assistance to residents. The hope was that protection from Viet Cong raids and taxation would bind the rural populace to the government and gain their loyalty. The program started in 1962, but was fatally undermined by over expansion and poor execution. By 1964 it had clearly failed.

GVN, Government of (South) Vietnam

RVN, Republic of (South) Vietnam

RVNAF, Republic of (South) Vietnam Armed Forces

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/terms

***

20230901 Cong Dong Tham Luan

20230901 Cong Dong Tham Luan

 

#704: Bác Hồ Của Các Em Red Bull Được Unesco Vinh Danh??? | 31.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShysxPEUQAo&t=8s

#703: Sư Hổ Mang Ăn Nên, Làm Ra Rằm Tháng Bảy | 29.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY3RRqsZfkQ&t=182s

#702: Ở VN Ngủ Tới Trưa, Nước Ngoài Phải Dậy Sớm Đi Cày | 28.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exzqwCeAvyQ&t=11s

#701: Điểm Độc Đáo Của Bảng Quảng Cáo Miền Nam Trước 1975 | 28.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2zEooWfdtY

#700: Thiến Sĩ Bake Cộng Le Tham Duong Ra Sức B.ịt Miệng HX Ra Sao? | 27.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2tJPSBLKP8&t=14s

#699: VK Xách Tiền Về Nuôi VC Còn Bị Mỉa M.a.i | 25.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35QlvQbvHQc&t=11s

#698: Cái Cò Sau 1975 | 24.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxetIhvvgaQ&t=409s

#697: Luật Sư Thiên Đường Xã Nghĩa | 23.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfeQ-aBnG3s&t=42s

#696: Vin Phắc Thất Bại Toàn Tập Do Đâu? | 22.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXLSXe0-a4A&t=20s

#695: Học Tiếng Anh “Lãng Phí, Mất Gốc” | 20.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnu0eF2w2fA&t=77s

#694: Ai Đã Đứng Sau Việc Lấy M.á.u Các Em Học Sinh? | 20.08.23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIOzGl2pF3I&t=9s

31.8.23 VIỆT CỘNG ĐẨY NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG RA NƯỚC NGOÀI LÀM MƯỚN. TIẾNG KÊU AI OÁN THẤU TẬN TRỜI XANH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHk9sOZjr68

30.8.23 (02.9.1945) QUỐC KHÁNH VỚI AI, QUỐC NẠN VỚI AI?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5GpL-lsg04&t=8s

30.8.23 VÕ THỊ SÁU CÓ THẬT SỰ LÀ NỮ ANH HÙNG NHƯ VIỆT CỘNG TUYÊN TRUYỀN?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVN3Z-nS7Gg&t=327s

29.8.23 VN CỜ ỚP CHÍNH QUYỀN, 76 NĂM NHÌN LẠI, CẢ NƯỚC BỊ LỜ ƯA TỪ CỜ ỚP CQ ĐẾN CỜ ỚP TÀI SẢN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeSc5D845dQ&t=8s

29.8.23 BLOOMBERG XOÁ PHẠM NHẬT VƯỢNG RA KHỎI DANH SÁCH 500 TỶ PHÚ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFSxQahRt1g&t=11s

Tâm tinh với Trương Quốc Huy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UroQXnwDz8&t=191s

28.8.23 THẦY CHÙA XỨ XÃ NGHĨA NÓ LẠ QUÁ TA!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEeR4q9eRYM&t=9s

 

20230901 Ban tin Mung Mot Thang Chin

20230901 Ban tin Mung Mot Thang Chin

 

*** No more subject ***

Hệ thống truyền thông bố già msmgogo đã vi phạm hiến pháp Hoa Kỳ First Amendment, vì thế những bản tin kế tiếp củng sẽ không có chủ đề.

https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/first-amendment

https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/freedom-of-speech#section_1

https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/bill-of-rights

https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/constitution

 

https://www.infowars.com/posts/my-fellow-americans-this-is-a-civil-war-patriot-actor-jon-voight-warns-bidens-trump-indictments-tearing-country-apart/

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2023/08/30/big-pharma-is-far-more-powerful-than-all-governments-combined/?ref=truth11.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-30-florida-counties-sign-resolution-ban-covid-vaccines.html

https://slaynews.com/news/multiple-florida-counties-back-resolution-ban-covid-shots/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-07-19-florida-gop-declares-covid-vaccines-bioweapon.html

SlayNews.com

NaturalNews.com

http://chemicalviolence.com/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-29-republican-activist-stabbed-home-suspicious-circumstances.html

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/08/28/republican-activist-fatally-stabbed-in-neck-at-new-hampshire-home/

https://nhjournal.com/few-answers-in-stabbing-death-of-nhgop-activist/

https://nypost.com/2023/08/28/gop-lawyer-fatally-stabbed-at-nh-home-was-former-new-yorker-who-wanted-to-be-willy-wonka/

https://www.unh.edu/

https://www.unh.edu/

https://patriot.news/

Breitbart.com

NHJournal.com

NYPost.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzkTcciNmHs

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228437

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228436

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/vuH1hhpSMocG/

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228434

https://rumble.com/embed/v3ajfwg/?pub=4

https://usawatchdog.com/maui-mayhem-murder-supernatural-evil-steve-quayle/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaI_EKCMLi0

https://youtu.be/WaI_EKCMLi0?si=OmBm6aOFTIiNtQdt

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228426

http://www.voterig.com/.um1.html

http://www.voterig.com/

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228423

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVID8jENuzQ

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/CvpBAHDLU2XF/

https://realrawnews.com/2023/08/military-arrests-moderna-clot-shot-creator/

  

Wednesday, August 30, 2023

20230831 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P44

20230831 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P44

 

Từ các hồ sơ tường trình 261, 263, 264 cho thấy quyết định của Kissinger và Nixon về vấn đề số phận của miền Nam Việt-Nam Cộng-Hòa.

<In Kissinger’s report to Nixon on the day’s meeting, he noted: “We finished the complete text of the agreement, including the provisions for signature.” With the final text in hand, Kissinger focused on obtaining the agreement of South Vietnamese President Thieu: “Our major problem now, of course, is Saigon. I believe the only way to bring Thieu around will be to tell him flatly that you will proceed, with or without him. If he balks and we then initial, there will still be 3 to 4 days between initialing and signing for the pressures to build up. I have already told Le Duc Tho that we would have to discuss the situation in this eventuality. In any event, if we once again delay the initialing or reopen the negotiations, we would not only jeopardize but certainly lose everything that has been achieved.” ( Foreign Relations, 1969–1976, vol. IX, Vietnam, October 1972–January 1973, Document 263)…

… Nixon replied quickly, in full agreement with Kissinger: “I also totally agree that we must go ahead with the agreement with Hanoi regardless of whether Thieu goes along or not. If we cannot deliver Thieu, we then obviously will have the problem of Hanoi’s reaction. In that event, there would be no Presidential announcement made on Thursday, January 18. Instead, we would have Haig delay his return so that there would be no pressure for an announcement until after January 20. Then, on January 22, I would make an announcement that we had reached an agreement in principle with the North Vietnamese and call on Thieu to adhere to it. I have already told Haig that he is to tell Thieu that we are not going to negotiate with him but rather that we will proceed and we are presenting this, in effect, on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.” (Ibid., Document 264)>

Dưới đây là hai phương thức tiến hành việc ký hiệp ước (cho dù Thiệu đồng ý hay Thiệu không đồng ý) từ hồ sơ 261.

… “Option 1—Thieu agrees

—Friday, January 12, Kissinger returns to Washington.

—Saturday, January 13, Haig leaves for Saigon.

—Monday, January 15, announcement of bombing halt due to progress in Paris.

—Wednesday, January 17, Haig returns to Washington.

—Thursday p.m., January 18, Presidential announcement that agreement in principle has been reached between all parties and that President has directed Dr. Kissinger to proceed Paris on Friday, January 19, or Monday, January 22, to initial final text. The announcement should also include a statement on when cease fire would come into effect.

—Friday, January 19, or Monday, January 22, Kissinger initialing in Paris.

—Friday, January 26, four-party signature of agreement in Paris.

—ca February 1, trip to Hanoi.

Option 2—Thieu intransigent

—Friday, January 12, Kissinger returns to Washington.

—Saturday, January 13, Haig leaves for Saigon.

Haig extends visit in Saigon to include stops in Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Bangkok and Seoul.

—Saturday, January 20, or Sunday, January 21, Haig returns to Washington.

—Monday, January 22 or Tuesday, January 23, Presidential television address announcing agreement between Washington and Hanoi, and Thieu’s refusal to come along.

261. Message From the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (Haig) to the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) in Paris1

Washington, January 11, 1973, 0317Z.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261

20230717 Jan 11 73 Hak Tho Negotiations Memorandum 45

45. Memorandum of Conversation

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/ch6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d45

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1247

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1248

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1249

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1250

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1251

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1252

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1253

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1254

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1255

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1256

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1257

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1258

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1259

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1260

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1261

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1262

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1263

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1264

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1265

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1266

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1267

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1268

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1269

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1270

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1271

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1272

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1273

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1274

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1275

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_1276

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d45#fnref:1.7.4.4.28.15.8.2

263. Message From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) to President Nixon 1

Paris, January 11, 1973, 1735Z.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_942

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_943

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.77.8.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.77.16.4.4

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.77.16.8.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d263#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.77.16.12.4

264. Message From Richard T. Kennedy of the National Security Council Staff to the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) in Paris1

Washington, January 11, 1973, 1752Z.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_945

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.79.8.4

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d264#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.79.16.2

261. Message From the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (Haig) to the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) in Paris1

Washington, January 11, 1973, 0317Z.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_937

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/pg_938

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d258

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d259

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.69.8.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.69.14.2

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.69.14.6

262. Message From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) to President Nixon 1

Paris, January 11, 1973, 0828Z.

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d261

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.73.8.6

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.73.14.2

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.73.16.4.2

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v09/d262#fnref:1.7.4.4.20.73.16.12.2

Van Ban Hiep Dinh Paris 27011973

http://suthat-toiac.blogspot.com/2008/07/hip-nh-paris-2711973-vn-bn.html

Agreement on ending the war and restoring peace in Viet-Nam. Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/volume-935-I-13295-English.pdf

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20935/v935.pdf

***

NLF=National Liberation Front=Mặt Trận Dân Tộc Giải Phóng,

PRG=Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam = Chính phủ Cách mạng Lâm thời Việt Nam,

DRVN= Democratic Republic of North Vietnam=Việt Nam Dân Chủ Cộng Hòa=cộng sản Bắc Việt.

DRV (also DRVN), Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam

NLF, National Liberation Front, Communist front organization in South Vietnam acting as political government of the insurgency; later renamed Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam

NVA, North Vietnamese Army, term used by the United States for the People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PAVN, People’s Army of (North) Vietnam

PLAF, People’s Liberation Armed Forces, Communist forces in South Vietnam, synonymous with Viet Cong

PRG, Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, political wing of the South Vietnamese Communist movement, replaced the National Liberation Front (NLF), but the terms are often used interchangeably

Paris Peace Talks, a loosely defined term that, depending on context, could mean the secret meetings between Henry Kissinger for the United States and Le Duc Tho for the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam or the 174 meetings of the public talks held from 1968 to 1973 between the United States and the Republic of (South) Vietnam on one side and the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam on the other; the latter were also known as Plenary or Avénue Kléber talks

Rue Darthé, 11 Rue Darthé, the address of one of the residences of the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam in the Paris suburb of Choisy-le-Roi used as a venue for the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho negotiations.

Avenue Kléber (also Ave. Kléber or Kléber), address of the International Conference Center at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, the site of the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; see also Paris Peace Talks

SALT, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks

Seven Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on May 31, 1971, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho; peace plan presented by the NLF Delegation in July 1971 at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Nine Points, peace plan presented by Xuan Thuy on June 26, 1971

Ten Points, peace plan presented by NLF delegate Madame Binh on May 8, 1969, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; peace plan presented by Le Duc Tho on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Kissinger; peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 14, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

Two-Point Elaboration, elaboration of the Ten Point peace plan presented by the DRV Delegation on February 2, 1972, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks

Twelve Points, peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho

strategic hamlets, a South Vietnamese Government program to counter Viet Cong control in the countryside. The government relocated farmers into fortified hamlets to provide defense, economic aid, and political assistance to residents. The hope was that protection from Viet Cong raids and taxation would bind the rural populace to the government and gain their loyalty. The program started in 1962, but was fatally undermined by over expansion and poor execution. By 1964 it had clearly failed.

GVN, Government of (South) Vietnam

RVN, Republic of (South) Vietnam

RVNAF, Republic of (South) Vietnam Armed Forces

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/terms

***