20230722 Cong Dong Tham Luan Chuyen Di Dem P4
Trong tài liệu nầy Kissinger bổ túc thêm quân số của
Hoa Kỳ thật thụ là 434,000 quân thay vì 422,000 quân. Vì thế cho nên số lượng
quân rút về Hoa Kỳ mổi tháng tăng hơn con số đã ấn định.
… “Mr. Kissinger:
I have one technical point, and then look
forward to hearing your views. It is a minor technical point on the figures I
gave you at the last meeting.
The figure for the number of U.S. troops
now in Vietnam is 12,000 higher than the figure I gave you, that is the
total figure is 434,000, not 422,000. You should therefore change
the figures I gave you last time as follows: In the fourth month, rather than 27,000
men we would withdraw 35,000. And in the fifth month we would withdraw 39,000
rather than 35,000.” …
Ngoài ra cộng sản giặc Hồ dùng chính phủ ma tại miền
Nam (NLF=Mặt Trận Dân Tộc Giải Phóng, PRG-Chính Phủ Cách Mạng Lâm Thời Việt-Nam)
để làm áp lực với Kissinger trên bàn hội nghị và dùng hai chính phủ ma nầy để chuẩn
bị lật đổ chính phủ miền Nam Việt-Nam trong cuộc bầu cử sau khi loại bỏ nội các
của Tổng Thống Nguyễn Văn Thiệu.
Tuy nhiên cuộc bầu cử đã không xảy ra sau ngày
30/04/1975 và hai chính phủ ma đều biến mất không tâm tích sau ngày nầy.
Kissinger đã đưa lên bàn hội nghị chương trình rút
quân của Hoa Kỳ trong vòng 16 tháng, thế nhưng cộng sản giặc Hồ đã dùng Nguyễn
Thị Bình làm bung sung để bắt Hoa Kỳ phải rút quân trong vòng 6 tháng.
… “In the military field, previously we demanded the U.S. withdraw
rapidly and totally troops from South Vietnam. Madame Nguyen Thi Binh has
proposed six months. We support her demand. Today I presented in detail how
this withdrawal should be carried out.” ….
Có một nghi vấn là liệu Xuân Thủy và Lê Đức Thọ có phải
là người của Trung Cộng hay không? Nói rõ hơn, cả hai là người tầu đội tên Việt-Nam.
Củng như những người trong hai chính phủ ma tại miền Nam củng có thể là những
người tầu dưới tên Việt.
Một khi đã hiểu rõ Hồ Chí Minh là một tên tầu đội lốt
Nguyễn Ai Quốc thì những thành phần ngồi vào bàn hội nghị đều có thể là những
tên tầu đội lốt người Việt. Đừng quên từ năm 1969 Mao Zedong đã gửi sang Hà Nội
320,000 quân tầu PLA.
Qua cuộc tranh luận trong bàn hội nghị về vấn đề nội
loạn của Cambodia và Pathet Laos cho thấy rõ cộng sản giặc Hồ đã đứng bên sau
những biến cố nầy và Hoa Kỳ hiểu rất rõ vấn đề.
…
“Again, there is a simple test. Who has troops in Cambodia? Not the
U.S. I am impressed again with the linguistic ability of the people of
the Indo-Chinese peninsula. We discovered that the Pathet Lao speak
Vietnamese, and now we find the same phenomenon in Cambodia. We have
shown great resistance vis-à-vis the bases you maintain in Cambodia and
which you use in attacking our forces in Vietnam.” ….
NLF=
National Liberation Front=Mặt Trận Dân Tộc Giải Phóng,
PRG=Provisional
Revolutionary Government of Vietnam = Chính phủ Cách mạng
Lâm thời Việt Nam,
DRVN= Democratic
Republic of North Vietnam=Việt Nam Dân Chủ Cộng Hòa=cộng sản Bắc Việt.
DRV (also DRVN), Democratic
Republic of (North) Vietnam
NLF, National
Liberation Front, Communist front organization in South Vietnam acting as
political government of the insurgency; later renamed Provisional Revolutionary
Government of Vietnam
NVA, North
Vietnamese Army, term used by the United States for the People’s Army of
(North) Vietnam
PAVN, People’s
Army of (North) Vietnam
PLAF, People’s
Liberation Armed Forces, Communist forces in South Vietnam, synonymous with
Viet Cong
PRG, Provisional
Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, political wing of the South Vietnamese
Communist movement, replaced the National Liberation Front (NLF), but the terms
are often used interchangeably
Paris Peace Talks, a
loosely defined term that, depending on context, could mean the secret meetings
between Henry Kissinger for the United States and Le Duc Tho for the Democratic
Republic of (North) Vietnam or the 174 meetings of the public talks held from
1968 to 1973 between the United States and the Republic of (South) Vietnam on
one side and the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam and the Provisional
Revolutionary Government of Vietnam on the other; the latter were also known as
Plenary or Avénue Kléber talks
Rue
Darthé, 11 Rue Darthé, the address of one of the residences
of the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam in the Paris suburb of
Choisy-le-Roi used as a venue for the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho negotiations.
Avenue
Kléber (also Ave. Kléber or Kléber), address
of the International Conference Center at the Hotel Majestic in Paris, the site
of the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks; see also Paris
Peace Talks
SALT, Strategic
Arms Limitation Talks
Seven Points, peace
plan presented by Kissinger on May 31, 1971, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho;
peace plan presented by the NLF Delegation in July 1971 at the (plenary) Paris
Peace Talks
Nine
Points, peace plan presented by Xuan
Thuy on June 26, 1971
Ten Points, peace
plan presented by NLF delegate Madame Binh on May 8, 1969, at the (plenary)
Paris Peace Talks; peace plan presented by Le Duc Tho on August 1, 1972, at his
meeting with Kissinger; peace plan presented by Kissinger on August 14, 1972,
at his meeting with Le Duc Tho
Two-Point Elaboration, elaboration
of the Ten Point peace plan presented by the DRV Delegation on February 2,
1972, at the (plenary) Paris Peace Talks
Twelve Points, peace
plan presented by Kissinger on August 1, 1972, at his meeting with Le Duc Tho
strategic hamlets, a
South Vietnamese Government program to counter Viet Cong control in the
countryside. The government relocated farmers into fortified hamlets to provide
defense, economic aid, and political assistance to residents. The hope was that
protection from Viet Cong raids and taxation would bind the rural populace to
the government and gain their loyalty. The program started in 1962, but was
fatally undermined by over expansion and poor execution. By 1964 it had clearly
failed.
GVN, Government of (South) Vietnam
RVN, Republic
of (South) Vietnam
RVNAF, Republic
of (South) Vietnam Armed Forces
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/terms
20230716 Apr 4 1970 Hak Tho Negotiations Memorandum 5
-
5. Memorandum of Conversation
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/ch1
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d5
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_68
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_69
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_70
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_71
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_72
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_73
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_74
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_75
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_76
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_77
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_78
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_79
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_80
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_81
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_82
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_83
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_84
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_85
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_86
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_87
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_88
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_89
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_90
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_91
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/pg_92
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v06/d223
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v42/d5#fnref:1.7.4.4.8.23.8.2
No comments:
Post a Comment