20221121 Cong Dong Tham Luan Mot Bai Dien Van
The Secret Speech of General Chi Haotian
https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/
General Chi’s Nasty Wuhan Soup: A Recipe for
BioWar?
https://jrnyquist.blog/2020/01/30/general-chis-nasty-wuhan-soup-a-recipe-for-biowar/
In 2005, The Epoch Times acquired a secret speech given by Defense Minister
Chi Haotian to high-level Communist Party Cadres sometime before his retirement
in 2003. Details given in Chi’s speech coincide with previously unpublished
defector testimony on Sino-Russian military plans.
The speech follows:
Comrades,
I’m very excited today, because the
large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next
generation is quite promising and our party’s cause will be carried on. In
answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of
war,” more than 80 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative,
exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I’d like to focus on why we asked
sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a
sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the
issue of the three islands, [where I] mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic
theme of “peace and development” had come to an end, and concluded that
modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also
mention we have a vital stake overseas. Today, I’ll speak more specifically on
these two issues.
The central issue of this survey appears to
be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its
real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to
figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude toward war is: If these future
soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, they’ll naturally be
doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to
the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war.
Actually, however, this is not our genuine
intention. The purpose of the CCP Central Committee in conducting this survey
is to probe people’s minds. We wanted to know: If China’s global development
will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse
that scenario? Will they be for or against it?
As everybody knows, the essence of Comrade
Xiaoping’s thinking is “development is the hard truth.” And Comrade Jintao, has
also pointed out repeatedly and emphatically that “development is our top
priority,” which should not be neglected for even a moment. But many comrades
tend to understand “development” in its narrow sense, assuming it to be limited
to domestic development. The fact is, our “development” refers to the great
revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the
land we have now but also includes the whole world.
Why do I put it this way?
Both Comrade Liu Huaquing, one of the leaders
of the old generation in our Party, and Comrade He Xin, a young strategist of
our Party, have repeatedly stressed the theory regarding the shift of the
center of World Civilization. Our slogan of “revitalizing China” has this way
of thinking as its basis. You may look into the newspapers and magazines
published in recent years or go online to do some research to find out who
raised the slogan of national revitalization first. It was Comrade He Xin. Do
you know who He Xin is? He may look aggressive and despicable when he speaks in
public, with his sleeves and pants all rolled up, but his historical vision is
a treasure our Party should cherish.
In discussing this issue, let us start from
the beginning.
As everybody knows, according to the views
propagated by Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single
mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial superiority. However,
according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are
different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead,
we originated independently in the land of China. The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian
that we are all familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors’ evolution.
“The Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization”
currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive and
systematic research on the origin, process and development of the ancient
Chinese civilization. We use to say, “Chinese civilization has had a history of
five thousand years.” But now, many experts engaged in research in varied
fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have
reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan Culture in the
northeast, the Liangahn Cutlure in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha Ruins in
Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Hunan province
are all compelling evidence of the exitence of China’s early civilizations, and
they prove that China’s rice-growing agricultural history alone can be traced
back as far as 8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of “five
thousand years of Chinese civilization.”
Therefore, we can assert that we are the
product of cultural roots of more than a million years, and a single Chinese
entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese entity of two thousand years.
This is the Chinese nation that calls itself, “descendants of Yan and Huang,”
the Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitler’s Germany had once bragged
that the German race was the most superior race on earth, but the fact is, our
nation is far superior to the Germans.
During our long history, our people have
disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and
they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the
South Pacific.
We all know that on account of our national
superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization
was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the world civilization, and
no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of
our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country,
we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the world shifted
to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the
center of the world civilization shift back to China?
Comrade He Xin put it in his report to the
Central Committee in 1988: If the fact is that the center of leadership of the
world was located in Europe as of the 18th Century, and later shifted to the
United States in the mid-20th century the center of leadership of the world
will shift to the East of our planet. And, “the East” of course mainly refers
to China.
Actually, Comrade Lui Huaquing made similar
points in the 1980s. Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the
center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western
Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East.
Therefore, if we refer to the 19th century as the British century, and the 20th
century as the American century, then the 21st century will be the Chinese
century.
To understand conscientiously this historical
law and to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of
our Party. As we all know, at the end of the last century, we built the Altar
to the Chinese Century in Beijing.
At the very moment of the arrival of the new
millennium, the collective leadership of the Party Central Committee gathered
there for a rally, upholding the torches of Zhoukoudian, to pledge themselves
to get ready to greet the arrival of the Chinese Century. We were doing this to
follow the historical law and setting the realization of the Chinese century as
the goal of our Party’s endeavors.
Later, in the political report of our Party’s
Sixteenth National Congress, we established that national revitalization should
be our great objective and explicitly specified in our new Party Constitution
that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese people. All these steps marked a
major development in Marxism, reflecting our Party’s courage and wisdom. As we
all know, Marx and his followers have never referred to any communist party as
a pioneer of a certain people; neither did they say that national
revitalization could be used as a slogan of a communist party. Even Comrade Mao
Zedong, a courageous national hero, only raised high the banner of “the global
proletarian revolution,” but even he did not have the courage to give the
loudest publicity to the slogan of national revitalization.
We must greet the arrival of the Chinese
Century by raising high the banner of national revitalization. How should we
fight for the realization of the Chinese Century? We must borrow the precious
experiences in human history by taking advantage of the outstanding fruition of
human civilization and drawing lessons from what happened to other ethnic
groups.
The lessons include the collapse of communism
in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well as the defeats of
Germany and Japan in the past. Recently there has been much discussion of the
lessons of the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern
European countries, so I will not dwell on them here. Today I’d like to talk
about the lessons of Germany and Japan.
As we all know, Nazi Germany also placed much
emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The
Nazi Party and government organized and established various propaganda and
educational institutions such as the “Guiding Bureau of National Propaganda,”
“Department of National Education and Propaganda,” “Supervising Bureau of
Worldview Study and Education,” and “Information Office,” all aimed at
instilling into the people’s minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the
idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical
mission of the Aryan people is to become the “lords of the earth” whose right
it is to “rule over the world.” Back then the German people were much more
united than we are today.
Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter
shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the
study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that
governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany and
Japan’s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize based on the German model,
we must not repeat the mistakes they made.
Specifically, the following are the
fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at
once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a
time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverance
required for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be
ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troubles that
resurfaced later on.
Let’s presume that back then Germany and
Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a protracted
war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained
some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in obtaining the
technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise attacks
against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the United
States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend themselves and
would have had to surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious
mistake in launching the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. This attack did not hit
the vital parts of the United States. Instead, it dragged the United States
into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried the
German and Japanese fascists.
Of course, if they had not made these three
mistakes and won the war, history would have been written in a different
fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan
might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards,
China and the whole of Asia under Japan’s command would have brought into full
play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled by Germany and unified the
whole world. This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions.
So, the fundamental reason for the defeats of
Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the “lords of the
earth,” for they are, after all, not the most superior race.
Ostensibly, in comparison, today’s China is
alarmingly similar to Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the
most superior races; both of them have a history of being exploited by foreign
powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the tradition of
worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they have seriously
insufficient living space; both of them raise high the two banners of
nationalism and socialism and label themselves as “national socialism”; both of
them worship “one state, one party, one leader, and one doctrine.”
And yet, if we really are to make a
comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it,
Germany belongs to “pediatrics” – too trivial to be compared. How large is
Germany’s population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We
eliminated eight million nationalist troops in only three years. How many
enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little
more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic
after being around for more than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting
center of civilization is of course more profound than Hitler’s theory of “the
lords of the earth.” Our civilization is profound and broad, which has
determined that we are so much wiser than they were.
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans
because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a
longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis our ancestors
left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great
unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these
heritages.
This heritage determined that we have a
stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has
been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by either
heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national
disasters. This is our advantage.
Take response to war as an example. The
reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on
its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, these enemies would reach
Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president
to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.
Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in making
decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s no
wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our
advantage! Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great
unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they only
focused on power of the top leader, but ignored the collective leadership of
the central group. That’s why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life,
which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war capacity.
What makes us different from Germany is that
we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and Protestant
country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that
ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should therefore make
decisions, and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany did
not have the tradition of worshipping sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese
society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we don’t worship any
God. Once you worship a god, you can’t worship a person at the same time,
unless you recognize the person as the god’s representative like they do in
Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a
sage, of course you will want him to be your leader…. This is the foundation of
our democratic centralism.
The bottom line is, only China is a reliable
force in resisting the Western parliament-based democratic system. Hitler’s
dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in history.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we
recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the
West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people
listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us?
If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader,
question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in
our society question why we are leaving God in churches, can our Party continue
to rule China?
Germany’s dream to be the “lord of the earth”
failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon
them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought
to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The
three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country’s living space; firmly grasp the
Party’s control over the nation; and firmly grasp the general direction toward
becoming the “lord of the earth.”
Next, I’d like to address these three issues.
The first issue is living space. This is the
biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I
said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is
the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the
information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less
than those of Germany’s back then. In addition, economic development in the
last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing
for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is
severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our
ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened,
to a degree much greater than faced by Germany back then.
Anybody who has been to Western countries
knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests
alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their
sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered by a layer of
dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground
water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without filtering. They have few
people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential
building; in contrast, our streets are always crawling with people, and several
people have to share one room.
Many years ago, there was a book titled
Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of
consumption, our limited resources would not long support the population and
society would collapse, once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our
population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports
to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue.
The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.
But the term ‘living space’ (lebensraum) is
too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this
too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which
could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our
emphasis on He Xin’s new theory, “Human rights are just living rights,” we only
talk about “living,” but not “space,” so as to avoid using the term “living
space.” From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with
the issue of living space is because Western countries established colonies
ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around
the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living
space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China,
so that they could develop outside of China.
The second issue is our focus on the
leadership capacity of the ruling party. We’ve done better on this than their
party. Although the Nazis spread their power to every aspect of the German
national government, they did not stress their absolute leadership position
like we have. They did not take the issue of managing the power of the party as
first priority, which we have. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the “three
treasures” of our party’s victory in conquering the country, he considered the
most important “treasure” to be developing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
and strengthening its leadership position.
We have to focus on two points to fortify our
leadership position and improve our leadership capacity.
The first is to promote the “Three
Represents” theory, stressing that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese
race, in addition to being the pioneer of the proletariat. Many citizens say in
private, “We never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can
you claim to be our representatives?”
There’s no need to worry about this issue.
Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we could lead the Chinese people outside of
China, resolving the lack of living space in China, the Chinese people will
support us. At that time, we don’t’ have to worry about the labels of “totalitarianism”
or “dictatorship.” Whether we can forever represent the Chinese people depends
on whether we can succeed in leading the Chinese people out of China.
The second point, whether we can lead the
Chinese people out of China, is the most important determinant of the CCP’s
leadership position.
Why do I say this?
Everyone knows that without the leadership of
our Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest principle is to
forever protect our Party’s leadership position. Before June 4, we realized
vaguely that as long as China’s economy is developed, people would support and
love the Communist Party. Therefore we had to use several decades of peacetime
to develop China’s economy. No matter what-isms, whether it is a white cat or a
black at, it is a good cat if it can develop China’s economy. But at that time,
we did not have mature ideas about how China would deal with international
disputes after its economy becomes developed.
Comrade Xiaoping said then that the main
themes in the world were peace and development. But the June 4 riot gave our
Party a warning and gave us a lesson that is still fresh.
The pressure of China’s peaceful evolution
makes us reconsider of these two main themes of our time. We see that neither
of these two issues, peace and development, have been resolved. The western
oppositional forces always change the world according to their own visions;
they want to change China and use peaceful evolution to overturn the leadership
of our Communist Party. Therefore, if we only develop the economy, we still
face the possibility of losing control.
The June 4 riot almost succeeded in bringing
a peaceful transition; if it were not for the fact that a large number of
veteran comrades were still alive and at a crucial moment they removed Zhao
Ziyang and his followers, then we all would have been put in prison. After
death we would have been too ashamed to report to Marx. Although we have passed
the test of June 4, after our group of senior comrades pass away, without our
control, peaceful evolution may still come to China like it did to the former Soviet
Union. In 1956, they suppressed the Hungarian incident and defeated the attacks
by Tito’s revisionists of Yugoslavia, but they could not withstand Gorbachev
thirty some years later. Once those pioneering senior comrades died, the power
of the Communist Party was taken away by peaceful evolution.
After the June 4 riot was suppressed, we have
been thinking about how to prevent China from peaceful evolution and how to
maintain the Communist Party’s leadership. We thought it over and over but did
not come up with any good ideas. If we do not have good ideas, China will
inevitably change peacefully, and we will all become criminals in history.
After some deep pondering, we finally come to this conclusion: Only by turning
our developed national strength into the force of a first striking outward –
only by leading people to go out – can we win forever the Chinese people’s
support and love for the Communist Party. Our party will then stand on
invincible ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the Communist
Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with their hearts and
minds, as was written in a couplet frequently seen in the countryside some
years ago: “Listen to Chairman Mao, follow the Communist Party!” Therefore, the
June 4 riot made us realize that we must combine economic development with
preparation for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then,
our national defence policy has taken a 180 degree turn and we have since
emphasized more and more “combining peace and war.” Our economic development is
all about preparing for the needs of war! Publicly we still emphasize economic
development as our center, but in reality, economic development has war as its
center! We have made a tremendous effort to construct “The Great Wall Project”
to build up, along our coastal and land frontiers as well as around large and
medium-sized cities, a solid underground “Great Wall” that can withstand a
nuclear war. We are also storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we
will not hesitate to fight a Third World War, so as to lead the people to go
out and to ensure the Party’s leadership position. In any event, we, the CCP,
will never step down from the stage of history! We’d rather have the whole
world, or even the entire globe, share life and death with us than step down
from the stage of history! Isn’t there a “nuclear bondage” theory? It means
that since nuclear wepaons have bound the security of the entire world, all
will die together if death is inevitable. In my view, there is another kind of
bondage, and that is, the fate of our Party is tied up with that of the whole
world. If we, the CCP, are finished, China will be finished, and the world will
be finished.
Our Party’s historical mission is to lead the
Chinese people to go out. If we take the long view, we will see that history
led us on this path. First, China’s long history has resulted in the world’s
largest population, including Chinese in China as well as overseas. Second,
once we open our doors, the profit-seeking western capitalists will invest
capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can
occupy the biggest market in the world. Third, our numerous overseas Chinese
help us create the most favorable environment for the introduction of foreign capital,
foreign technology, and advanced experience into China. Thus, it is guaranteed
that our reform and open-door policy will achieve tremendous success. Fourth,
China’s great economic expansion will inevitably lead to the shrinkage of
per-capita living space for the Chinese people, and this will encourage China
to turn outward in search for new living space. Fifth, China’s great economic
expansion will inevitably come with significant development in our military
forces, creating conditions for our expansion overseas. Ever since Napoleon’s
time, the West has been alert for the possible awakening of the sleeping lion
that is China. Now, the sleeping lion is standing up and advancing into the
world, and has become unstoppable!
What is the third issue we should clinch
firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance?
It is to hold firmly onto the big “issue of America.”
This appears to be shocking, but the logic is
actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental
judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party
Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict with the
Western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be obstructed by the
western countries doing everything they can. So, Only by breaking the blockade
formed by the western countries headed by the United States can China grow and
move toward the world!
Would the United States allow us to go out to
gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it
is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even
Japan, [so] how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries
like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our
need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is
the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to
have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same
leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of
the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We the descendants
of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said
that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social status in the
United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the “issue of
America,” the western countries of Europe would bow to us, not to mention
Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the “issue of America”
is the mission assigned to the CCP members by history.
I sometimes think how cruel it is for China
and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road! Do
you remember a movie about Liberation Army Troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng
Xiaoping? The title is something like “Decisive Battle on the Central Plains.”
There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and grandeur: “The
enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the brave will win!” It is
this kind of fighting to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize power in
Mainland China. It is historical destiny that China and the United States will
come to unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other! The
United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurt China, and
also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will certainly
be an obstruction, and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the
relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death
struggle.
One time, some Americans came to visit and
tried to convince us that the relationship between China and the United States
is one of interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: “Go
tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a
relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.” Actually, Comrade
Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more frank, “The relationship
between China and the United States is one of life-and-death struggle.” Of
course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our
reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and
technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to
promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and
use America as an example to reconstruct our country.
How have we managed our foreign affairs in
these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please them,
even if we have to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left cheek,
we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the United
States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the “Story of
Wuxun”? In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and
suffered so much beating and kicking! The United States is the most successful
country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful
experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently
imitating the American tone “China and the United States rely on each other and
share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our
civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two
tigers to live together.
We also must never forget what Comrade
Xiaoping emphasized: “Refrain from revealing ambitions and put others off the
track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our
ultimate goals, hide our capabilities, and await the opportunity. In this way,
our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something
peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of war? Instead, when
revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified
“March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why
we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue” but not the “American
issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover of
another.” If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in their
eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole
picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s
arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to
Russia; do you really think our Party Committee is a fool?
To resolve the issue of America we must be
able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country
defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the
people in the conquered land because back then you could not kill people
effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns.
Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the
people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would
not be able to make many people migrate there.
Only by using special means to “clean up”
America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only
choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or
not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up
America”?
Conventional weapons such as fighters,
canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive
weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish
together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have
been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost.
Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able
to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern
biological technology, and new bio-weapons have been invented one after
another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the
opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our
purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was
still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the
right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on
developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy
country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should
issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and
leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they
should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America
was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does
not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means
to “clean up” America and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our
historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in
the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the
leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their
ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If
the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse
is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of Yellow
Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more
than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported
nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is
more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity.
One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any
time and more than half the population will have to go.
We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios.
If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the Chinese people
will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United
States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from
the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than
half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air
defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be,
we can only move forward fearlessly, for the sake of our Party and State and
our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the
sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be
reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone.
In Chinese history, in the replacement of
dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always failed.
The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after
defeating Liu Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his
forces, and his leniency resulted in Xiang Yu’s death and Liu’s victory ….
Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute measures. In
the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will eventually meet
each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean
cruelty toward the Chinese people. Here some people may want to ask me: What
about the several millions of our compatriots in the United States? They may
ask: aren’t we against Chinese killing other Chinese?
These comrades are too pedantic; they are not
pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should
not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the several
million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big issue.
Therefore, in recent years, we have been conducting research on genetic
weapons, i.e., those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a
result with this kind of research is extremely difficult.
Of the research done on genetic weapons
throughout the world, Israel is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are
designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached
the stage of actual deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some
research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect
Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their
technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in
a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthrough can be
achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer.
Old comrades like us cannot afford to wait
that long, for we don’t have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my age may
be able to wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period of the
anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any longer.
Therefore, we have to give up our expectations
about genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of
those Chinese living in the United States have become our burden, because they
have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal values for a long time and it
would be difficult for them to accept our Party’s leadership. If they survived
the war, we would have to launch campaigns in the future to deal with them, to
reform them. Do you still remember that when we had just defeated the
Koumintang (KMT) and liberated Mainland China, so many people from the
bourgeois class and intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had
to launch campaigns such as the “suppression of the reactionaries” and
“Anti-Rightist Movement” to clean them up and reform them? Some of them were in
hiding for a long time and were not exposed until the Cultural Revolution.
History has proved that any social turmoil is likely to involve many deaths.
Maybe we can put it this way: death is the
engine that moves history forward. During the period of the three kingdoms, how
many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia, how many people died?
When Manchu invaded the interior of China, how many people died? Not many
people died during the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great
Mountains, and during the political campaigns such as “suppression of the
reactionaries,” “Three-Anti-Campaign,” and “Five-Anti-Campaign,” at least 20
million people died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be
trembling with fear when they hear about wars and people dying.
During wartime, we were used to seeing dead
people. Blood and flesh were flying everywhere, corpses were lying in heaps on
the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the battlefields,
everybody’s eyes turned red with killing because it was a life-and-death
struggle and only the brave would survive.
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two
hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese
century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians,
do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of
Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is
more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our
Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP. Since
the day we joined the CCP, the Party, life has always been above all else!
History will prove that we made the right choice.
Now, when I am about to finish my speech, you
probably understand why we wanted to know, whether the people would rise
against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to “clean up” America.
For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a whole generation
has not been tested by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, there
have been many changes in the formats of war, the concept of war and the ethics
of war. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European
Communist states, the ideology of the West has come to dominate the world as a
whole, and the Western theory of human nature and western view of human rights
have increasingly been disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore,
we were not very sure about the people’s attitude. If our people are
fundamentally opposed to “cleaning up” America, we will, of course, have to
adopt corresponding measures.
Why didn’t we conduct the survey through
administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good
reason.
First of all, we did it to reduce artificial
inference and to make sure that we got the true thoughts of the people. In
addition, it is more confidential and won’t reveal the true purpose of our
survey. But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who are
able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are
relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the hard-core and leading
groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the
people as a whole will follow us. If they oppose us, they will play the
dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance.
What turned out to be very comforting is they
did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a
score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party’s work in
propaganda and education over the past few decades.
Of course, a few people under western
influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and children.
Is everybody crazy? Some others said, “The Chinese love to label themselves as
a peace-loving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The
comments are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.”
Although there are not too many people
holding this kind of viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation
in any significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to
respond to this kind of argument.
That is to vigorously propagate Comrade He
Xin’s latest article, which has already been reported to the central
government. You may look it up on the website.
If you get on the website using key words to
search, you will find out that a while ago comrade He Xin pointed out to the
Hong Kong Business News during an interview that: “The U.S. has a shocking
conspiracy.” According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1,
1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States,
gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen, economic leaders and
scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the U.S. president at the
time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as
George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most
popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level
roundtable conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide
humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in
hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the
21st century a mere 20 percent of the world’s population will be sufficient to
maintain the world’s economy and prosperity, the other 80 percent or 4/5ths of
the world’s population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The
people in attendance thought that this excess 80 percent population would be a
trash population and “high-tech” means should be used to eliminate them
gradually.
Since the enemies are secretly planning to
eliminate our population, we certainly cannot be infinitely merciful and
compassionate to them. Comrade He Xin’s article came out at the right time, it
has proven the correctness of our tit for tat battle approach … [and] Comrade
Deng Xiaoping’s great foresight to deploy against the United States military
strategy.
Certainly, in spreading Comrade He Xin’s
views, we cannot publish the article in the Party newspapers, in order to avoid
raising the enemy’s vigilance. He Xin’s conversation may remind the enemy that
we have grasped the modern science and technology, including “clean” nuclear
technology as well as biological weapons technology, and we can use powerful
measures to eliminate their population on a large scale.
The last problem I want to talk about is of
firmly seizing the preparations for military battle.
Currently, we are at the crossroad of moving
forward or backward. Some comrades saw problems flooding everywhere in our
country – the corruption problem, the state-owned enterprise problem, the
bank’s bad accounts problem, environmental problems, society security problems,
education problems, the AIDS problem, various appeals problems, even the riots
problem. These comrades vacillated in the determination to prepare for military
battles. They thought: they should first grab the political reform problem,
that is, our own political reform comes first. After resolving the domestic
problems, we can then deal with the foreign military battle problem.
This reminds me of the crucial period in 1948
in the Chinese Revolution. At that time the People’s Liberation Army’s “horses
were drinking water” in the Yangtze River, but they faced extremely complex
situations and difficult problems everywhere in the liberated areas, and the
central authority received emergency reports daily. What to do? Should we stop
to manage rear areas and internal matters first before moving forward, or press
on to pass the Yangtze River with one vigorous effort? Chairman Mao, with his
extraordinary wisdom and mettle gave the marching order “Carry on the
revolution to the end,” and liberated all of China. The previously thought
“serious” conflicting problems were all resolved in this great forward moving
revolutionary wave.
Now, it seems like we are in the same
critical period as the “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River days
in the revolutionary era, as long as we resolve the United States problem at
one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our
military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan but in fact is aimed at
the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking
aircraft carriers or satellites.
Marxism pointed out that violence is the
midwife for the birth of China’s century. As war approaches, I am full of hope
for our next generation.
END
https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/
The
Chinese Communist Party has
made it public that they were in the last throws of a one hundred year plan to
take over America (the US and Canada). They have sent their college youth to
learn and plant themselves in the US for use as soldiers later. The Chinese
Defense Minister General Chi Haotian outlined a two phased attack on America:
(1) A Bioweapon Attack (Covid-19) to soften them up and a (2) Nuclear Attack to
complete the mission. https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/
General Chi’s Nasty Wuhan Soup: A Recipe
for BioWar?
https://jrnyquist.blog/2020/01/30/general-chis-nasty-wuhan-soup-a-recipe-for-biowar/
Only by using non-destructive
weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for
ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology,
and new bio-weapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have
not been idle…. We are capable of achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’
America all of a sudden.
General Chi Haotian
In a secret speech given to
high-level Party cadres nearly two decades ago, Chinese Defense Minister, Gen.
Chi Haotian, explained a long- range plan for ensuring a Chinese national
renaissance. He said there were three vital issues that must be grasped. The
first was the issue of living space — because China is severely overpopulated
and China’s environment is deteriorating. The second issue, therefore, is that
the Communist Party must teach the Chinese people to “go out.” By this Gen. Chi
meant the conquest of new lands in which a “second China” could be built by
“colonization.” From this arises the third vital issue: the “issue of America.”
General Chi warned his listeners:
“This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple.” China is
“in fundamental conflict with the Western strategic interest.” Therefore,
America will never allow China to seize other countries to build a second
China. America stands in China’s way. Chi explained the problem as follows:
Would the United States allow us to
go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in
blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan, Vietnam,
India, or even Japan, [so] how much more living space can we get? Very trivial!
Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land
to serve our need for mass colonization.
“We are not as foolish as to want to
perish together with America by using nuclear weapons,” said the general. “Only
by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to
reserve America for ourselves.” The answer is found in biological weapons. “Of
course,” he added, “we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the
opportunity to master weapons of this kind.”
The ruling Chinese Communist Party
considers biological weapons to be the most important weapons for accomplishing
their goal of “cleaning up America.” Chi credits Deng Xiaoping with putting
biological weapons ahead of all other weapon systems in the Chinese arsenal:
When Comrade Xiaoping was still with
us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision
not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal
weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
It may seem difficult to believe,
but Gen. Chi considered himself to be a “humanitarian” communist, and therefore
admitted to mixed personal feelings on this matter: “I sometimes think how
cruel it is for China and the United States to be enemies….” After all, he
noted, America helped China in World War II. Chinese people remember that
America opposed Japanese imperialism. But none of that matters now. “In the
long run,” said Gen. Chi, “the relationship of China and the United States is
one of a life-and-death struggle.” This tragic situation must be accepted.
According to Gen. Chi, “We must not forget that the history of our civilization
repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live
together.”
According to Gen. Chi, China’s
overpopulation problem and environmental degradation will eventually result in
social collapse and civil war. General Chi estimated that “more than 800
million” Chinese would die in such a collapse. Therefore, the Chinese Communist
Party has no policy alternative. Either America is “cleaned up” by biological
attacks, or China suffers national catastrophe. Chi makes the following
argument:
We must prepare ourselves for two
scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the
Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight
against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear
retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in
which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be
ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities.
In his speech, Gen. Chi provides us
with a key for understanding China’s development strategy. According to Chi,
“Our economic development is all about preparing for the needs of war!” It is
not about improving the life of Chinese people in the short run. It is not
about building a consumer-oriented capitalist society. “Publicly, said Gen,
Chi, “we still emphasize economic development as our center, but in reality,
economic development has war as its center!”
The same can be said for China’s
intense interest in the biological sciences. The West has yet to grasp the
underlying motive for China’s ready participation in the West’s P4 microbiology
labs, where the world’s most deadly microbes are studied, (i.e., pathogen
lethality level 4 labs). This now bubbles to the surface in the Novel
Coronavirus pandemic which has occurred in Wuhan, at the heart of China, just
outside China’s principle P4 virology lab (specializing in deadly viruses).
Not long after delivering his
speech, General Chi stepped down as Defense Minister in 2003, the same year as
the SARS (Coronavirus) outbreak in China. This was also (coincidentally) the
same year Beijing decided to build the Wuhan P4 virology lab. Given Gen. Chi’s
speech, is the Novel Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan an accident occasioned by
weaponizing the virus at the city’s P4 microbiology lab?
Three data points are worth
considering. First, in 2008 Taiwan’s top security official told lawmakers that
“Taiwan had intelligence linking the SARS virus to research done in Chinese
labs.” Given China’s economic clout and political infiltration of Chinese
language media, it is not surprising that National Security Bureau Director
Tsai Chao-ming was forced to retract his statement, which had none of the usual
features of a “gaff.” Was Director Tsai forced to retract a statement that was true,
since he could not reveal his intelligence sources inside China?
The second data point worth
considering: The Virology Journal has an article by
Gulfaraz Khan, published on February 28, 2013, outlining the discovery of the
Novel Coronavirus in Saudi Arabia in June 2012. Yes, it is the very same Novel
Coronavirus with the following difference: when first discovered it could not
be readily transmitted from humans to humans. Something changed in the virus
since that time. Thus, the Wuhan version is labeled 2019-nCoV instead of simply
NCoV. The latter is not contagious, while the former is spreading rapidly
through China as these words are written. What do you suppose changed its
transmissibility between 2012 and 2020? Random mutation or weaponization? If the
current lethal outbreak had occurred in any other city than Wuhan, we might be
inclined to believe in a random mutation. But Wuhan is ground zero for Chinese
bioweapons. Should we credit such a coincidence?
The third data point worth
considering: GreatGameIndia.com has published a piece titled “Coronavirus
Bioweapon – How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It.” The
authors were clever enough to put Khan’s Virology Journal article
together with news of a security breach by Chinese nationals at the Canadian
(P4) National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, where the Novel Coronavirus was
allegedly stored with other lethal organisms. Last May the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police were called in to investigate, by late July the Chinese were
kicked out of the facility. The chief Chinese scientist was allegedly making
trips between Winnipeg and Wuhan.
Here we have a plausible theory of
the NCoV organism’s travels: first discovered in Saudi Arabia, studied in
Canada from whence it was stolen by a Chinese scientist and brought to Wuhan.
Like the statement of Taiwan’s intelligence chief in 2008, the
GreatGameIndia.com story has come under intensive attack. Whatever the truth,
the fact of proximity and the unlikelihood of mutation must figure into our
calculations. It is highly probable that the 2019-nCoV organism is a weaponized
version of the NCoV discovered by Saudi doctors in 2012. It is almost certainly
part of the bioweapons program extolled by Gen. Chi Hàotián nearly two decades
ago.
We must have an investigation of the
outbreak in Wuhan. The Chinese must grant the world total transparency. The
truth must come out. If Chinese officials are innocent, they have nothing to
hide. If they are guilty, they will refuse to cooperate.
The real concern here is whether the
rest of the world has the courage to demand a real and thoroughgoing
investigation. We need to be fearless in this demand, and not allow “economic
interests” to play a coy and dishonest game of denial. We need an honest
inquiry. We need it now.
End Notes:
“SARS a Chinese Weapon: Taiwan
Official,” https://www.smh.com.au/world/sars-a-chinese-weapon-taiwan-official-20081007-4vse.html
“A novel coronavirus capable of
lethal human infections: an emerging picture,” by Gulfaraz Khan, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599982/
“Coronavirus Bioweapon – How China
Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It,” https://greatgameindia.com/coronavirus-bioweapon/
https://jrnyquist.blog/2020/01/30/general-chis-nasty-wuhan-soup-a-recipe-for-biowar/
No comments:
Post a Comment